• Disclosure
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • CCPA
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Contact
  • About
Saturday, June 25, 2022
Travis County News Online
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Technology
    • Crytpocurrency
    • Gaming
    • Gadgets
  • Sports
  • Health
  • General
    • Business Services
  • Travel
  • Press Releases
  • Popular
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Technology
    • Crytpocurrency
    • Gaming
    • Gadgets
  • Sports
  • Health
  • General
    • Business Services
  • Travel
  • Press Releases
  • Popular
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home News Local News

Austin Voters To Decide On Decriminalizing Small Amounts Of Weed And Banning No-Knock Warrants In May – Austin Monitor

austin-voters-to-decide-on-decriminalizing-small-amounts-of-weed-and-banning-no-knock-warrants-in-may-–-austin-monitor
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Wednesday, January 19, 2022 by Audrey McGlinchy, KUT

Austin voters will be asked in May if they want to decriminalize small amounts of marijuana and do away with no-knock warrants.

The former practice is already police policy. In July 2020, the Austin Police Department said it would no longer ticket or arrest people for small amounts of marijuana.

City Council has also adopted a policy against the use of no-knock warrants, but the police department has yet to write it into its manual. If voters approve these measures, both would become part of the city’s charter, essentially making them city law.

According to APD’s current manual, the department can use no-knock warrants when officer safety is an issue and with approval from both a commander and a judge. This type of warrant allows officers to enter premises without first announcing their presence; the practice become especially controversial following the deaths of Breonna Taylor and Atatiana Jefferson. The police union president told KUT last week that he believes the department used three no-knock warrants last year; APD was not able to confirm this number by deadline.

The ban, if approved by voters, would outright prohibit no-knock warrants and require officers serving warrants to knock, announce their presence and wait 15 seconds before entering.

The election, which will be held May 7, is the result of a successful petition effort from the group Ground Game Texas. The nonprofit collected more than 30,000 signatures last year, and the Austin city clerk verified the signatures last week.

Once a petition is certified, City Council has several options: It can either make the policies city law or put them on a ballot. On Tuesday, the Austin City Council voted 7 to 3 to put these questions to voters, with Council members Greg Casar, Pio Renteria and Vanessa Fuentes vying to outright accept the changes.

“I think we could simply adopt the ordinance today. I think the community is likely to adopt it through their vote,” Casar said. “I would rather save us the expense.”

Neither Travis County nor the city of Austin could provide KUT with a cost estimate for the election by deadline. According to a city spokesperson, the decision on whether to decriminalize marijuana and ban no-knock warrants will be presented to voters as one question, not two separate ones.

Some Council members were adamant about putting the policies before voters so the laws would have more weight behind them.

“My motion to put this on the ballot is not an indication of me being opposed to the policies here,” Council Member Ann Kitchen said, before the vote. “It’s simply that I think that this is the best way to proceed with these questions.”

Mike Siegel, political director with Ground Game Texas, told KUT he wonders if by outright adopting the new policies, the city could open itself up to legal interference from the state. Possession of marijuana, even small amounts, remains illegal in Texas.

“I guess a majority of the Council was concerned about legal risk,” Siegel said. “There’s always this dynamic in Austin with Democrats being concerned that if they take action that’s perceived as progressive, (they will face) retribution from state government.”

This story was produced as part of the Austin Monitor’s reporting partnership with KUT.

The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.

Travis County News Online

© 2021 Travis County News Online

Navigate Site

  • Disclosure
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • CCPA
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Contact
  • About

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • DMCA Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclosure
  • CCPA
  • Terms of Use

© 2021 Travis County News Online

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT